Technology and Asylum Procedures
After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures across Europe, new technologies have become reviving these types of systems. Out of lie detection tools tested at the line to a program for confirming documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of technology is being made use of in asylum applications. This article explores just how these technologies have reshaped the ways asylum procedures will be conducted. This reveals how asylum seekers will be transformed into pressured hindered techno-users: They are asked to adhere to a series www.ascella-llc.com/counseling-services-for-students/ of techno-bureaucratic steps also to keep up with unforeseen tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs their capacity to get around these devices and to pursue their right for proper protection.
It also shows how these technologies will be embedded in refugee governance: They aid the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity simply by hindering them from being able to view the channels of proper protection. It further argues that examines of securitization and victimization should be along with an insight in the disciplinary mechanisms of such technologies, by which migrants are turned into data-generating subjects just who are disciplined by their reliance on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal expertise, the article states that these solutions have an inherent obstructiveness. They have a double impact: while they assistance to expedite the asylum method, they also generate it difficult just for refugees to navigate these systems. They are positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes all of them vulnerable to bogus decisions created by non-governmental stars, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their conditions. Moreover, they pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ that may result in incorrect or discriminatory outcomes.